tren+90 212 481 08 12
·
bilgi@kiriscihukuk.com
Pzt - Cum 09:00-18:00
·

Enforcement And Bankruptcy Law

Kirişçi Law Firm offers legal consultancy and representation services in enforcement and bankruptcy law to individual and corporate clients. The collection of receivables, initiation and conduct of enforcement proceedings, attachment (haciz) proceedings, objection procedures, negative clearance (menfi tespit) and recovery (istirdat) actions, and other disputes arising from enforcement law are managed by our firm.

Our practice in enforcement and bankruptcy law is not limited to claim and debt relationships involving real persons. Enforcement proceedings and legal disputes of companies operating across various sectors are also handled by our firm.

Ceza Hukuku

How Does The Process Work?

1. Case File Review

The nature, legal basis, and debtor’s current status are evaluated to determine the most effective enforcement procedure.

2. Initiation Of Enforcement Proceedings

Enforcement proceedings are initiated in line with the established strategy, and all necessary formal notification procedures are executed.

3. Attachment And Objection Procedures

In the event of a debtor’s objection, actions for the removal or annulment of objection are conducted, alongside attachment (haciz) proceedings where required.

4. Collection And Reporting

The collection process is pursued through to completion, with clients receiving regular progress updates regarding their cases.

Corporate File Management

Our firm currently handles approximately 5,000 active enforcement files within a structured and systematic framework. The tracking, reporting, and monitoring requirements demanded by this volume of cases are executed through our firm’s established corporate division of labor.

Debt Collection

Initiating enforcement proceedings, executing attachment procedures, and collecting receivables.

Objection And Litigation Processes

Handling actions for the annulment of objection, negative clearance, and recovery.

Insurance And Recourse Claims

Pursuing insurance receivables and recourse claims through enforcement proceedings and litigation.

How Are Enforcement Proceedings Initiated?

Enforcement proceedings begin when a creditor applies to the enforcement office (icra dairesi) to collect a debt through state authority. The specific proceeding type is determined based on whether the claim is backed by a court judgment, a negotiable instrument (kambiyo senedi) such as a check or promissory note, or an unadjudicated claim backed by ordinary documents.

The enforcement request (takip talebi) specifies the identities of the creditor and debtor, the monetary claim amount, interest demands, and the legal basis of the obligation. Following the payment of statutory fees and administrative costs, a payment order (ödeme emri) is issued and served on the debtor. Attorneys can also initiate both judgment-based (ilamlı) and non-judgmental (ilamsız) enforcement proceedings electronically via the UYAP Attorney Portal.

Upon service of the payment order, the debtor may either satisfy the obligation or lodge an objection within the statutory period. If the debtor fails to object within the time limit and does not pay, the proceeding becomes final (takip kesinleşir); thereafter, provided legal conditions are met, attachment (haciz) and sale proceedings against the debtor’s assets can be conducted.

What Happens If The Debtor Objects To The Enforcement Proceeding?

In non-judgmental enforcement proceedings (ilamsız icra takibi), the debtor may object to the entire debt, a portion of it, interest rates, signature authenticity, or the territorial jurisdiction of the enforcement office within the statutory period following the service of the payment order. An objection filed within the prescribed time limit automatically stays the proceeding with respect to the contested portion.

In this scenario, the creditor cannot directly proceed to asset attachment (haciz). For the enforcement proceeding to move forward, the creditor may request the removal of objection (itirazın kaldırılması) before the enforcement court or file an action for the annulment of objection (itirazın iptali davası) in general civil courts, depending on the nature of the claim and the supporting documentation. Initiating an action for the annulment of objection requires a valid non-judgmental enforcement proceeding and a timely objection that has halted said proceeding.

If it is determined that the debtor’s objection was unjustified and made solely to gain time, execution denial indemnity (icra inkâr tazminatı) can also be requested from the court, provided the statutory conditions are met. The appropriate legal remedy must be determined based on the supporting documents, the nature of the claim, and the scope of the debtor’s objection.

What Are Actions For Negative Clearance And Recovery?

An action for negative clearance (menfi tespit davası) is a lawsuit filed to determine that a person is not indebted or that the debt demanded from them does not exist in whole or in part. A debtor may initiate this action either prior to the commencement of enforcement proceedings or while proceedings are ongoing.

Filing an action for negative clearance does not automatically stay ongoing enforcement proceedings in every instance. To prevent the progression of enforcement or the payout of funds held in the enforcement treasury (icra veznesi) to the creditor, an application for a preliminary injunction (ihtiyati tedbir) must be made to the court, subject to statutory conditions and the provision of collateral. Therefore, ongoing enforcement steps and potential asset attachments must be comprehensively evaluated before filing suit.

An action for recovery (istirdat davası), on the other hand, is filed by a person who paid a sum under the threat of execution despite not being legally indebted, with the objective of recovering the paid amount. While negative clearance aims to establish the non-existence of a debt, a recovery action seeks the refund of an already executed payment. For both actions, payment receipts, enforcement file records, contracts, and evidence concerning the legal basis of the claim carry critical importance.

Are Corporate Enforcement Files Handled Differently From Individual Files?

In enforcement proceedings where companies are parties, the fundamental rules of enforcement law are largely identical to those applied to real persons. However, due to the company’s legal personality, trade registry records, representation and binding authority, commercial ledgers, and operational structure, tracking corporate enforcement files may require a more comprehensive analysis.

Directing proceedings to the exact corporate title and trade registry details, serving formal notifications properly to the company’s Registered Electronic Mail (KEP) or trade registry address, and identifying authorized corporate representatives are crucial. As a rule, corporate shareholders and executives cannot be held directly liable for corporate debts; whether personal liability arises must be evaluated independently based on the corporate form and special statutory provisions.

In corporate enforcement files, attachment (haciz) procedures may involve bank accounts, vehicles, real estate, rights and claims held by third parties, and revenue generated from commercial operations. For entities managing a high volume of enforcement cases, systematically reporting collections, objections, payment schedules, and file expenses is essential. Proceedings before enforcement offices are carried out in distinct stages, including initiation, finalization (kesinleşme), attachment, sale, and collection.

Let us help you!

We’re here to help you take the right and reliable steps in your legal proceedings.

+90 212 481 08 12

bilgi@kiriscihukuk.com

How can we help you?

Call Us: +90 212 481 08 12

bilgi@kiriscihukuk.com
·  Mon – Fri 09:00-18:00